Research foundation

Fifty years of rigorous research and business application. Operationalized.

Teaming behaviors are the most validated predictors of team performance. GreenTeam turns that peer-reviewed research into live, meeting-level measurement.

Scientific foundation
0+

Years of peer-reviewed research. Applied.

Green Team is built directly on Amy Edmondson's world-class teaming framework. Not just sentiment analysis. Not just surveys. Proven science, scored in every meeting.

How it works

This is not another
engagement survey.

Behavioral science, applied at scale — not sentiment, not a once-a-year pulse.

  • Every meeting becomes a data point.
  • Every participant receives a score.
  • Every team sees its trajectory — week by week.
Team Dynamics

Team Dynamics: From Organizational DNA to Scalable Performance

Every team operates on a unique behavioral spectrum. While some segments drive breakthroughs, others remain stagnant — stalled by power struggles or the perceived threat of AI displacement. These latent anxieties and ambitions surface daily in every meeting. They are leading indicators of either unleveraged growth or systemic operational risk.

Decode human capital in your team. Pivot to a high-return model.

Scroll to visualize your team's evolution.

2020
Remote-first at scale
2022
Hybrid becomes default
2024
Engagement hits 10-yr low
2025
AI becomes a coworker
2026
Human–AI teaming, measured
The evidence

Read the science for yourself.

We don't ask you to take our word for it. These are the peer-reviewed studies our scoring engine operationalizes — open any of them and read the evidence.

Research backing

The numbers behind
high-performing teams.

EdmondsonHarvard
Psychological safety · Harvard Business School

Psychological safety is not about being nice. It's about courage, honesty, and treating every voice as a source of learning.

0%
More breakthrough ideas reported by psychologically safe teams
Edmondson, Harvard Business School
0%
Of employees withhold critical information from managers without psychological safety
Edmondson & Detert
0%
Higher innovation rates when teams score high on psychological safety
Edmondson et al., 2023
0.0×
More likely to experiment under pressure with high psychological safety
Google Project Aristotle (Edmondson framework)
Proven results

What happens when teams start measuring.

Two decades of research, validated across 3,000+ teams. These are outcomes from organizations that adopted Teaming practices — not projections.

Before
& After
4.1
7.3
+78%
Psychological safety
Edmondson, 12-wk pilot
3.8
6.9
+82%
Peer accountability
Teaming practice cohort
4.5
7.6
+69%
Decision velocity
3,000+ studied teams
3,000+ teams · cross-industry research

Higher teaming drives performance.

Across thousands of teams, teaming score is the strongest predictor of plan-vs-actual productivity — more reliable than headcount, tenure, or industry.

Each dot = one team

Start now.

Upload a meeting transcript and get your first behavioral and AI-readiness analysis in under ten minutes. When you're ready to scale, connect through secure OAuth integrations with the meeting platforms your teams already use.

Earlier issue escalation
Behavioral signals surface delivery risk weeks before it shows in project status updates.
Stronger constructive debate
Teams that score high on healthy collaboration resolve issues before they escalate to leadership.
Clearer decision ownership
Ownership signals correlate directly with fewer re-opened decisions and missed commitments.